Plants’ Ability to Absorb CO2 is Declining – What It Means for Climate Change

A new study by a father-and-son research team in the UK has uncovered a disturbing reality: the ability of plants and soils to sequester carbon dioxide has been in decline since peaking in 2008. This natural absorption process, once a crucial counterbalance to rising emissions, is now weakening, further exacerbating climate change.

The Researchers Behind the Study

The study was conducted by James Curran, the former Chief Executive of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, and his son, Sam Curran. James Curran has spent decades studying environmental changes and has been a key figure in climate policy development in Scotland. His expertise in environmental protection, coupled with Sam Curran’s data analysis skills, lends credibility to the study’s findings. Their research builds upon extensive datasets on atmospheric carbon levels and plant absorption rates, providing a comprehensive view of how the Earth’s natural sequestration mechanisms are shifting.

The Tipping Point in Carbon Sequestration

For decades, scientists hoped that rising CO2 levels would fuel plant growth and, in turn, increase the natural sequestration of carbon. Initially, this seemed to be the case—warmer temperatures and a longer growing season spurred vegetation growth. However, the study, published in Weather, suggests that we have crossed a threshold where the negative impacts of climate change—wildfires, droughts, floods, and extreme temperatures—are now reducing plants’ ability to store carbon.

The analysis found that since 2008, plants have been absorbing 0.25% less carbon dioxide per year. If this trend continues, it could significantly amplify the pace of global warming.

The Acceleration of Climate Change

The researchers, James and Sam Curran, concluded that CO2 emissions must now decrease by at least 0.3% per year just to maintain current atmospheric levels. Yet, global emissions have historically risen by 1.2% annually, making this a daunting challenge.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

“This growing and very damaging effect will further accelerate climate change and serves, yet again, to emphasize the close connection between the climate and nature emergencies,” the study states.

One of the most alarming takeaways is that if sequestration rates had continued to increase as they did in the 1960s—at about 0.8% per year—global CO2 concentrations today would be 30% lower. Instead, we now face a scenario where sequestration is declining, and carbon levels will rise faster than previously expected.

Visualizing the Data

Below is a graphical representation of the sequestration trends and emission growth over time:

A New Perspective: Can We Restore Sequestration?

While the original Ecowatch article highlights the crisis, an important follow-up question remains: can we reverse this trend? Some scientists believe that regenerative agriculture, reforestation, and ecosystem restoration could help recover lost sequestration capacity. However, these solutions require urgent global action, particularly in regions where deforestation and land degradation have been most severe.

Additionally, innovations in bioengineering—such as genetically modified plants with enhanced carbon absorption capabilities—are being explored as potential tools to boost sequestration. Some researchers are experimenting with plant varieties that have been engineered to develop deeper root systems, allowing for better carbon storage in the soil. Others are focusing on microbial soil amendments that can enhance plant growth and nutrient uptake, thereby improving overall sequestration rates.

Reforestation efforts, particularly in tropical rainforests, have also been shown to be one of the most effective natural solutions. However, these efforts must be accompanied by policies that prevent further deforestation. Programs such as REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) have been proposed as economic incentives for governments and landowners to protect existing forests rather than clear them for agriculture or development.

Another potential approach involves integrating carbon sequestration strategies into modern agricultural practices. Techniques such as agroforestry, where trees and crops are grown together, and no-till farming, which reduces soil disturbance, have shown promise in increasing carbon retention in soils while maintaining agricultural productivity.

Ultimately, restoring sequestration requires a combination of scientific innovation, sustainable land management, and international cooperation. Governments, corporations, and individuals all have a role to play in prioritizing policies and actions that can slow or reverse the decline in carbon sequestration before it is too late.

The Path Forward

The latest findings underscore the urgent need for both emission reductions and large-scale nature restoration efforts. Without intervention, the planet’s natural carbon sinks will continue to weaken, accelerating climate change and making mitigation efforts even more difficult.

As policymakers, scientists, and environmental organizations digest this study, one thing is clear: relying on nature alone to sequester our emissions is no longer a viable strategy. Instead, a combined approach of drastic emissions cuts, carbon capture technologies, and ecological restoration is needed to prevent further destabilization of our climate.

The declining ability of plants to absorb CO2 is a warning sign—but also an opportunity to rethink and reinvest in solutions that could help rebalance the planet’s carbon cycle before it’s too late.

Original Article: Ecowatch – Plants Are Losing Their Ability to Absorb CO2

Here you can find one possible solution to help increase carbon absorbsion

Acknowledgment of AI

Content developed using AI technology, with final review and refinement by our human editors to ensure clarity, coherence, and accuracy.